Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4839 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $73.12 vs $547.66
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-14900K - $0.56 vs $3.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 34% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-760 - 193 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
144
74.61139896373057%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57802 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.15/FPS
17.777777777777782%
Price, €
€607.9
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57800 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
14.737181554337312%
Multi-Core
1280
6.095238095238095%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |