Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $73.12 vs $265.41
- Up to 44% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-12900F - $0.55 vs $0.98 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 103% better in F1 23 than Core i5-760 - 301 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 24 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
148
49%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
301
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
56%
Price, €
€294.61
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €294.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |