Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $73.12 vs $186.45
- Up to 54% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.56 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-760 - 169 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
144
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
45%
Price, €
€206.96
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |