Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $73.12 vs $621.5
- Up to 86% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13400F - $0.73 vs $5.27 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-760 - 131 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
111
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11088 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.27/FPS
13%
Price, €
€689.87
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €689.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |