Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2361 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-760 - 151 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $64.34 vs $65.8
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |