Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1871 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i5-760 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $29.18 vs $73.12
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76384 minutes ago
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76384 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |