Buy on Amazon
€81.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-760 is 869 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $27.05 vs $73.12
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-760 Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76523 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
93.21663019693655%
Multi-Core
739
57.73437500000001%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.