Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $47.03 vs $318.06
- Up to 84% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-13900F - $0.19 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Apex Legends than Core i5-7500T - 302 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 32 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
271
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
302
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
16%
Price, €
€353.05
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |