Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 and the more expensive Core i5-7500T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500T - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - $45.33 vs $49.45
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500T - $0.39 vs $0.44 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €54.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €50.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |