Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - 287 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-8300 - $50.45 vs $81.91
- Up to 39% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - $0.2 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |