Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1610 - 176 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-7500 - $27.05 vs $64.42
- Up to 56% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-7500 - $0.18 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €71.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |