Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 840 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $54.84 vs $266.15
- Up to 77% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900 - $0.37 vs $1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7400T - 180 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
165
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Buy for €295.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |