Buy on Amazon
€60.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $564
Availability
MSRP in USD: $564
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $54.84 vs $336.34
- Up to 80% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-13900KF - $0.38 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-7400T - 195 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
162
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Core i9-13900KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.91/FPS
19%
Price, €
€373.34
16%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900KF Gaming Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) - Unlocked
Buy for €373.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-13900KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.