Buy on Amazon
€60.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $384
Availability
MSRP in USD: $384
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $54.84 vs $221.91
- Up to 71% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-13700KF - $0.52 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7400T - 138 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Core i7-13700KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
29%
Price, €
€246.32
24%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-13700KF Gaming Desktop Processor 16 cores (8 P-cores + 8 E-cores) - Unlocked
Buy for €246.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-13700KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.