Buy on Amazon
€60.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $54.84 vs $157.2
- Up to 65% better value when playing Control than Core i7-10700KF - $0.3 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i5-7400T - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
201
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
34%
Price, €
€174.49
34%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-10700KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for €174.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.