Buy on Amazon
€60.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $54.84 vs $92.01
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-7400T - 122 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics
Buy for €102.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
90.1595744680851%
Multi-Core
2806
77.53523072672009%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.