Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $87.02 vs $350.96
- Up to 73% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-13900KS - $0.36 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i5-7400 - 289 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
271
93.77162629757785%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €96.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5665 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
26.666666666666668%
Price, €
€389.57
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €389.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
37.874396135265705%
Multi-Core
3232
14.803279439380754%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |