Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $80.43 vs $153.55
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900F - $0.7 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400 - 146 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11681 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
59%
Price, €
€170.44
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |