Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400 is 2186 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i5-2500K - 175 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $87.02 vs $329.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-2500K - $0.55 vs $2.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €96.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1596 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
169
96.57142857142857%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
25.462962962962965%
Price, €
€365.19
26%
Buy for €365.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
54.93197278911565%
Multi-Core
1921
59.436881188118804%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |