Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2561 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than Core i5-7400 - 76 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $73.84 vs $80.43
- Up to 33% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-7400 - $1.08 vs $1.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14283 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |