Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7400 - 205 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $69.45 vs $80.43
- Up to 22% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7400 - $0.38 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15025 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |