Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1302 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than FX-9590 - 185 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than FX-9590 - $87.02 vs $210.6
- Up to 65% better value when playing Rust than FX-9590 - $0.52 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €96.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2223 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
158
85.4054054054054%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
35.13513513513514%
Price, €
€233.77
41%
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |