Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8350 - 164 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than FX-8350 - $80.43 vs $135.27
- Up to 44% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8350 - $0.54 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18395 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |