Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1345 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 55 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Starfield than FX-6350 - $1.62 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $73.12 vs $80.43
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 6 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |