Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7300HQ outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7300HQ is 1345 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7300HQ
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than FX-6350 - 221 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7300HQ - 6 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-7300HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
