Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-661 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-661 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-661.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-661
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $58.5 vs $71.78
- Up to 11% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-10105F - $0.24 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-661 - 295 vs 274 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i5-661 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-661 - 8 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €64.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
295
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
88%
Price, €
€79.68
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-661 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |