Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2751 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $131.58 vs $350.96
- Up to 52% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-13900KS - $1.33 vs $2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 27% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-6600T - 140 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 32 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
110
78.57142857142857%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4894 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.78/FPS
47.841726618705046%
Price, €
€389.57
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €389.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4902 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
38.0354267310789%
Multi-Core
3223
14.762057435991387%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |