Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2084 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $131.58 vs $185.71
- Up to 21% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-11900K - $0.89 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-6600T - 183 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
164
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
78%
Price, €
€206.14
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |