Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 2123 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-860 - 110 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - $72.35 vs $131.58
- Up to 38% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-6600T - $0.82 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
61.65413533834586%
Price, €
€146.05
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
98
89.0909090909091%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
37.764606265876374%
Multi-Core
1463
45.39249146757679%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |