Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600T is 304 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i7-5820K - 198 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $131.58 vs $314.37
- Up to 58% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-5820K - $0.74 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3921 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
197
99.4949494949495%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
41.80790960451977%
Price, €
€348.95
41%
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3920 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |