Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 791 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - $80.42 vs $131.58
- Up to 39% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-6600T - $0.49 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €146.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |