Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 956 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 103 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - $95.05 vs $131.58
- Up to 25% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-6600T - $1.06 vs $1.42 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
74.64788732394368%
Price, €
€146.05
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1575 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
100
97.0873786407767%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
84.41998306519899%
Multi-Core
2858
88.67514737821905%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |