Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 753 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Rust than Core i3-3250 - 196 vs 157 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 55 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
157
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12776 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |