Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 941 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 196 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 55 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |