Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3029 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $34.36 vs $316.6
- Up to 87% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-14900K - $0.22 vs $1.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Deathloop than Core i5-6600 - 206 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
176
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
13%
Price, €
€351.43
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €351.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |