Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1705 days newer than Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 73 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-660 - 123 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €121.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 135 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |