Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $109.64 vs $159.4
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 43% better in Starfield than Core i5-660 - 63 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-660 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 20 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €121.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63763 minutes ago
Buy for €176.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63764 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |