Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-660 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 3393 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $109.64 vs $211.32
- Up to 40% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-9700F - $0.52 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-660 - 271 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-660 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €121.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
59%
Price, €
€234.56
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €234.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |