Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-660 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 5114 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $109.64 vs $153.54
- Up to 15% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - $1.1 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-660 - 132 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €121.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12512 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
85%
Price, €
€170.43
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
73 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |