Buy on Amazon
€121.7
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $196
Availability
MSRP in USD: $196
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-660 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-660 is 1061 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610 - 235 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-660 - $27.05 vs $109.64
- Up to 75% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-660 - $0.13 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i5-660 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i5-660 Processor 3.33 GHz 4 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €121.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
233
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-660
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.