Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Up to 34% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $28.88 vs $43.86
- Up to 32% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G6900 - $0.19 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-6500 - 176 vs 173 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
173
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17848 minutes ago
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17847 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |