Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2644 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $52.77 vs $357.11
- Up to 83% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-13900KF - $0.34 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-6400 - 199 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
172
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€58.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €58.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
17%
Price, €
€396.39
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €396.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |