Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $57.77 vs $270.23
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700F - $0.35 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6400 - 217 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 28 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
181
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15422 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
25%
Price, €
€299.95
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15420 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |