Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 551 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3930T - 257 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $14.61 vs $45.19
- Up to 65% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-6400 - $0.07 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €50.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
238
92.60700389105058%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
49.32493249324932%
Multi-Core
948
31.35957657955673%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |