Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 578 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1820 - 102 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $28.95 vs $45.19
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €50.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Buy for €32.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
44.19441944194419%
Multi-Core
825
27.290770757525635%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |