Buy on Amazon
€50.16
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $182
Availability
MSRP in USD: $182
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 941 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 26% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 163 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $27.05 vs $45.19
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Intel Boxed Core I5-6400 FC-LGA14C 2.70 Ghz 6 M Processor Cache 4 LGA 1151 BX80662I56400
Buy for €50.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 332 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.