Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1334 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $65.81 vs $213.5
- Up to 67% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-9900KF - $0.38 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Rust than Core i5-5675C - 208 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
192
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
33%
Price, €
€236.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €236.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |