Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 849 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $65.81 vs $311.1
- Up to 78% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-7920X - $0.14 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-5675C - 532 vs 531 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
531
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6146 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
532
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
21%
Price, €
€345.32
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €345.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |