Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2132 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $65.81 vs $169.64
- Up to 56% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-11900KF - $0.65 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-5675C - 127 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 16 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
112
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
43%
Price, €
€188.3
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |