Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 1334 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $90.74 vs $182.8
- Up to 47% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-9700KF - $0.5 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-5675C - 216 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
201
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
53%
Price, €
€202.91
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |